Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
public:list_of_funny_research_papers [2019/06/18 11:50]
fangfufu
public:list_of_funny_research_papers [2019/10/11 15:13]
fangfufu [The BMJ]
Line 15: Line 15:
  
 Non-Christmas entries: ​ Non-Christmas entries: ​
-  * [[https://​casereports.bmj.com/​content/​11/​1/​bcr-2018-227468.full | December 2018: Prescribing lessons from an ocular chemical injury: Vitaros inadvertently dispensed instead of VitA-POS]]+  * [[https://​casereports.bmj.com/​content/​11/​1/​bcr-2018-227468 | December 2018: Prescribing lessons from an ocular chemical injury: Vitaros inadvertently dispensed instead of VitA-POS]]
  
  
Line 45: Line 45:
  
 ===== A Sociological Study of the Fart ===== ===== A Sociological Study of the Fart =====
-This is a Master'​s thesis written by someone from Central China Normal University. You can download the PDF from [[http://​new.oversea.cnki.net/​KCMS/​detail/​detail.aspx?​dbcode=CMFD&​dbname=CMFD2007&​filename=2007112933.nh|China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)]]. I am not a massive fan of the thesis, I think he could have explored the topic a bit further. He hasn't collected any data, it is more like a literature review / analysis for me. It is definitely not a MRes level work, in my opinion. I think it would have been great if he collected some data on how close you have to be before discussing bodily function, and perhaps look into if there is any age variation and regional variation. ​+This is not really a research paper, but I didn't want to create a new page just for this. This is a Master'​s thesis written by someone from Central China Normal University. You can download the PDF from [[http://​new.oversea.cnki.net/​KCMS/​detail/​detail.aspx?​dbcode=CMFD&​dbname=CMFD2007&​filename=2007112933.nh|China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)]] ​or {{ :​public:​a_sociological_study_of_the_fart_高建伟.pdf |here}}. I am not a massive fan of the thesis, I think he could have explored the topic a bit further. He hasn't collected any data, it is more like a literature review / analysis for me. It is definitely not a MRes level work, in my opinion. I suppose there is this toilet etiquette thing. I find those people who tend to be more polite talk less about pooping and farting. I think it would have been great if he collected some data on how close you have to be before discussing bodily function, and perhaps look into if there is any age variation and regional variation. ​ 
 + 
  
 ==== Abstract ==== ==== Abstract ====
  • public/list_of_funny_research_papers.txt
  • Last modified: 2019/10/11 15:13
  • by fangfufu